Key takeaways:
- AI detection is no longer optional. As AI writing becomes part of daily workflows, checking how “human” content appears is now a standard quality step for students, marketers, and editors.
- Originality.ai works best as a strict checkpoint tool. It delivers clear AI probability scores and plagiarism results, but offers no built-in way to improve flagged content.
- JustDone fits better into active writing workflows. It combines detection with humanizing and rewriting tools, making it easier to adjust AI-assisted content instead of just labeling it.
AI writing tools are now part of everyday workflows for students, marketers, editors, and researchers. As a result, AI detection has shifted from a niche concern to a routine quality check. Whether content is fully AI-generated, partially edited, or only assisted at the draft stage, many teams now need to verify how “human” a text appears before publishing or submitting it.
This demand has led to dozens of AI detectors entering the market. Among them, Originality.ai and JustDone are two tools often mentioned together, even though they approach detection from different angles.
In this review, I compare JustDone AI and Originality.ai based on hands-on use across marketing articles, academic-style content, and mixed human-AI drafts. The goal is not to crown a winner, but to clarify when each tool makes sense.
Quick Comparison Overview
To compare features of both tools, JustDone and Originality.ai, look at the table below.
| Feature | JustDone | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Detection and rewriting workflow | AI and plagiarism detection |
| Detection approach | Linguistic patterns and rhythm analysis | GPT probability and plagiarism |
| False positives | Lower in structured writing | Higher in formal content |
| Humanization tools | Built-in AI Humanizer | Not available |
| Plagiarism checker | Yes | Yes |
| Multilingual support | 25+ languages | Mostly English |
| Workflow tools | AI detector, AI humanizer, Plagiarism checker and Paraphraser | AI detection-focused, Plagiarism checker, Grammar checker |
| Best for | Writers, students, editors | SEO teams, publishers |
| Pricing | From $9.99/month (annual) | From $12.95/month |
Both tools have a high rate on Trustpilot and numerous positive reviews. Let's compare the data from Trustpilot.

And the same for Originality.ai:
AI Detection Capabilities: What’s the Difference?
Let's compare JustDone AI Detector and AI checker from Originality.ai on real examples.
Originality.ai
Originality.ai is designed primarily as a detection tool. You paste content into the editor and receive a percentage score estimating how likely the text is AI-generated. It also includes plagiarism detection, readability metrics, and basic content insights.
In practice, Originality.ai is very strict. Fully AI-generated content is usually flagged accurately. However, the tool tends to interpret consistent structure, formal tone, and fact-heavy explanations as AI signals. This means professional or academic writing can sometimes be flagged even when written by a human.
For instance, let's test the text about AI trends:

The results are clear but final. Originality.ai tells you what it thinks, but it does not guide you toward fixing the problem beyond rewriting manually.
JustDone
JustDone AI checker approaches detection as part of a broader writing loop. Its AI Detector analyzes sentence rhythm, repetition, predictability, and stylistic uniformity. Instead of only labeling content, it’s designed to connect directly with rewriting tools.
In my experience, JustDone produced fewer false positives on structured explanations, especially academic or long-form content. When AI signals were detected, the platform allowed immediate action through its AI Humanizer, which rewrites text to sound more natural without changing meaning.

This makes detection feel less like a verdict and more like a diagnostic step.
User Experience and Interface
A user-friendly interface is important for tools like JustDone and Originality.ai. Let's look at how easy it is to use both.
Originality.ai
The interface is minimal and functional. Everything loads quickly, and the detection results are easy to interpret. For users who only need scanning and reporting, the experience is straightforward.
That said, once a text is flagged, the workflow ends there. Any rewriting or fixing happens outside the tool. Here's what it looks like:

JustDone
JustDone’s interface is denser because it includes many tools. At first, this can feel overwhelming. Over time, however, the platform makes sense as a unified workspace.
Detection, humanization, paraphrasing, plagiarism checking, and editing all happen in one place.
For users working with multiple drafts or revisions, this reduces context switching and tool hopping.
Real Use Case Differences
First, I tested how both AI checkers cope with long-form AI-assisted writing. For long articles that started with AI but were heavily edited, Originality.ai often remained strict. Even after revisions, some texts were still flagged at high AI percentages.
JustDone handled these cases more flexibly. Detection results aligned better with how the content was actually created, and the humanizer helped smooth AI-like patterns without flattening the voice.
As for the mixed human and AI content, this is where the difference became clearer. Originality.ai sometimes flagged polished human writing as AI. JustDone was more tolerant of professional clarity and consistency, focusing instead on repetitive AI phrasing and unnatural rhythm.
Use Cases: Who Should Use Which Tool?
Originality.ai is a good fit if you:
- Need fast AI and plagiarism checks
- Work mostly with short-form content
- Want a simple yes/no style verdict
- Operate in SEO or publishing environments where strict detection is expected
JustDone works better if you:
- Write long-form or academic-style content
- Use AI as part of drafting, not a replacement
- Need to fix AI signals, not just detect them
- Work across multiple languages
- Want a single platform for detection and rewriting
Final Verdict
Originality.ai is a strong detector with a clear focus. It works well as a checkpoint tool and is widely used by SEO teams and publishers. Its strictness can be helpful, but it also leads to false positives in formal or well-structured writing.
JustDone is better suited for writers who are actively working on content. Detection is only one part of the process, and the platform is designed to help improve text, not just judge it.
In short, Originality.ai tells you if content looks AI-generated, JustDone helps you understand why and fix it. Which one you choose depends less on accuracy claims and more on how you actually write.